Idaho State
Men
-
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
| Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
|---|
| 702 |
Jasmine Nesbitt |
FR |
21:13 |
| 993 |
Sasha Kent |
SO |
21:33 |
| 1,302 |
Katie Nichols |
SO |
21:52 |
| 1,335 |
Katie Nicholls |
SO |
21:55 |
| 1,816 |
Abigail Ashee-Simmonds |
SO |
22:23 |
| 2,283 |
Korbin Traughber |
FR |
22:54 |
| 2,440 |
Alexis Wilks |
FR |
23:06 |
| 2,771 |
Hayli Worthington |
SO |
23:30 |
| 2,823 |
Angela McGraw |
FR |
23:34 |
|
| National Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Regional Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
| Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Jasmine Nesbitt |
Sasha Kent |
Katie Nichols |
Katie Nicholls |
Abigail Ashee-Simmonds |
Korbin Traughber |
Alexis Wilks |
Hayli Worthington |
Angela McGraw |
|---|
| Color Country Invitational |
10/04 |
1233 |
21:24 |
21:56 |
21:33 |
|
22:13 |
23:04 |
22:42 |
23:29 |
23:40 |
| Santa Clara Bronco Invitational |
10/19 |
1246 |
21:23 |
21:49 |
22:05 |
|
22:11 |
22:43 |
22:53 |
23:10 |
|
| Big Sky Championships |
11/01 |
1228 |
21:13 |
21:19 |
21:52 |
|
22:33 |
22:51 |
24:11 |
23:52 |
23:30 |
| Mountain Region Championships |
11/15 |
1214 |
20:57 |
21:16 |
|
21:55 |
22:36 |
22:58 |
|
|
23:30 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Region Championship |
100% |
16.3 |
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
2.8 |
9.9 |
17.6 |
20.5 |
21.8 |
17.9 |
8.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
| Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Jasmine Nesbitt |
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
| Sasha Kent |
76.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie Nichols |
95.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Katie Nicholls |
97.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Abigail Ashee-Simmonds |
115.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Korbin Traughber |
125.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Alexis Wilks |
128.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
| Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
| 1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
| 8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
| 9 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
9 |
| 10 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
10 |
| 11 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
11 |
| 12 |
0.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
12 |
| 13 |
2.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
13 |
| 14 |
9.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
14 |
| 15 |
17.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
15 |
| 16 |
20.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
16 |
| 17 |
21.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
17 |
| 18 |
17.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
18 |
| 19 |
8.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
19 |
| 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
| Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
| Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
| Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
| Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
| Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |
